From e3cc6d15a3db64161254613eea5c684dc6d16423 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Laura=20Kl=C3=BCnder?= <laura@codingcatgirl.de>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:43:41 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] data migrate pydantic field better cause the validator is
 crap

---
 .../migrations/0124_beaconmeasurement_data_schema.py      | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/c3nav/mapdata/migrations/0124_beaconmeasurement_data_schema.py b/src/c3nav/mapdata/migrations/0124_beaconmeasurement_data_schema.py
index 4875a7d9..0de9f10f 100644
--- a/src/c3nav/mapdata/migrations/0124_beaconmeasurement_data_schema.py
+++ b/src/c3nav/mapdata/migrations/0124_beaconmeasurement_data_schema.py
@@ -15,7 +15,13 @@ def forwards_func(apps, schema_editor):
     for measurement in BeaconMeasurement.objects.all():
         if isinstance(measurement.data, list):
             measurement.data = {"wifi": measurement.data}
-            measurement.save()
+        measurement.data["wifi"] = [
+            [{**{k: v for k, v in peer.items() if k != "level"}, "rssi": peer.get("level", peer.get("rssi"))}
+             for peer in scan]
+            for scan in measurement.data["wifi"]
+        ]
+        measurement.save()
+
 
 
 class Migration(migrations.Migration):